Ignou.de

Ignou Books , Notes , Study Material , Solved Papers

Ms-26 Question bank

Ms-26 Question bank (12)

Ms-26 Question bank

MS-26   June-2011

MS-26 : ORGANISATIONAL DYNAMICS

1. Briefly describe different stages of Group Development and discuss the effects of Group Processes on Team Performance.

2. What is organisational stress ? Explain how stress could be minimised by organisational strategies. Explain with suitable examples.

3.What is Transformational Leadership ? Discuss   the need for Transformational Leaders in organisations and how individuals could be changed with the help of transformational leadership.

4. Explain the role of organisations towards society with the help of suitable examples.

5. Write short notes on any three of the following :

(a) Strategic alliances

(b) Management of Diversity

(c) Alienation

(d) Learning organisations

(e) Process of empowerment

6. Read the following case carefully and answer the questions given at the end :

Jagannath (Jaggu for his friends) is an over ambitious young man. For him ends justify means. With a diploma in engineering, Jaggu joined, in 1977, a Bangalore based company as Technical Assistant. lie got himself enrolled as a student in an evening college and obtained his degree in engineering in 1982. Recognising his improved qualific, Jaggu was promoted as Engineer-Sales in 1984. Jaggu excelled himself in the new role and became the blue-eyed boy of the management. Promotions came to him in quick succession. lie was made Manager-Sales in 1986 and Senior Manager - Marketing in 1988. Jaggu did not forget his academic pursuits. After being promoted as Engineer-Sales, he joined the M.B.A. (part--time.) programme. Alter completing his NIB...N., Jaggu became a Ph.D. Scholar and obtained his Doctorate in 1989. Functioning as Senior Manager-Marketing, Jaggu eyed on things beyond his jurisdiction. He  started complaining against Suresh, Section Head and Prahalad the Unit Chief (both production) with Ravi, the EVP (Executive-Vice President). The complaints included delay in executing orders, poor quality, customer rejections, etc. Most of the complaints were concocted.

   Ravi was convinced and requested Jaggu to head the production section so that things could be straightened up there. Jaggu became the Section Head and Suresh was shifted to sales. Jaggu started spreading his wings. He prevailed upon Ravi and got sales and quality under his control, in addition to production. Suresh, an equal in status, was now subordinated to Jaggu.

Success had gone to Jaggu's head. He had everything going in his favour - position, power,

money, and qualification. He divided workers and used them as pawns. He ignored Prahalad and established direct link with Ravi. Unable to hear the humiliation, Praha lad quit the company. Jaggu was promoted as General Manager. He became a megalomaniac.

Things had to end it some point.It happened in Jaggu's life too. There were complaints against him, he had inducted his brother-in law, Ganesh, as an ,:ngineer. Ganesh was by nature corrupt, he stole copper worth Rs. 5 lakh and was suspended. jaggu tried to defend Ganesh but failed in his effort. Corruption charges were also levelled against Jaggu who was reported to have made nearly Rs. 20 lakh for himself. On the new year day of 1993, Jaggu was reverted back to his old position - sales. Suresh was promoted and was asked to head production. Roles get reversed. Suresh became boss to Jaggu.

   Unable to swallow the insult, Jaggu put in his papers. Back home, Jaggu started his own consultancy claiming himself as an authority in quality management. He poached on his previous company and picked up two best brains in quality. From 1977 to 1993, Jaggu's career graph had a steep rise and a sudden fall. Whether there would be another hump in the curve is a big question ?

Questions :

(a) What political strategies did Jaggu use to gain power ?

(b) What would you do if you were

(i) Suresh, (ii) Prahalad or (iii) Ravi ?

(c) Bring out the ethical issues involved in Jaggu's behaviour.

Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:12

Ms-26 dec 2007

Written by

MS-26   Dec-2007

MS-26 : ORGANISATIONAL DYNAMICS

1.   Why do individuals join a group ? Describe the stages of group developme*l and the effect of group processes on performance ?

2. Differentiate between Stress and Burnout. describe ihe sources and stages of. Burnout. Discuss the remedial measures.

Thursday, 22 November 2012 17:10

Ms-26 dec 2008

Written by

MS-26   Dec-2008

MS-26 : ORGANISATIONAL DYNAMICS

 

1. Define the concept of empowerment and explain its importance. Describe the Process of. empowerment.

2. Define organisational culture and discuss briefly the functions and essence of organizational culture.

3. Describe the mechanisms of organizational learning and discuss the Facilitators and Retarders of organisational learning.

4.What is bumout ? Describe the sources and stages of burnout.

5. Write short notes on any three of the following :

(a) Importance of diversity management

(b) Alienation

(c) Role analysis techniques

(d) Shategic Alliances

(e) Issues in Business Ethics

6. Read the following case carefully and answer the questions given at the end :

Winthrop Hospital is located in a medium-sized suburban community. A general hospital it serves a large portion of the surrounding area and is usually operating at, near, or sometimes beyond its capacity. Each floor of the hospital has its own particular structure with regard to the nurses who staff it. This formalized hierarchy

runs from the supervisor (who must be a registered nurse) to registered nurses (RNs) to licensed practical nurses (LPNs) to students and nurses' aides. Professionally, there are some duties that are supposed to be performed only by the RNs : these are spelt out in the hospital manual. [n practice, however, the LPNs do much of the work that is supposed to be done by the RNs. The RNs are glad for the help because they are very busy with other duties. Through time the work done by the RNs and the LPNs has meshed so thoroughly that one just does the work

without thinking of whose job it is supposed to be. The hospital is normally so crowded that, even with everyone performing all types of work, there never seems to be enough time or enough help. , The procedural manual used at Winthrop Hospital was first used in 1947 and has not been revised. Everyone connected, with the hospital realizes that it is extremely outdated, and actual practice varies so greatly as to have no similarity to what is prescribed in the manual. Even the courses that the sfudent nurses take teach things entirely differently from what is prescribed in Winthrop's manual. The vacation privileges for nurses at the hospital show extreme differences for the diffelent types of nurses. RNs receive two weeks' vacation after nine months on the job, whereas LPNs must be on the staff for ten years before receiving their second week of vacation. The LPNs believe this to be extremely unfair and have been trying to have the privileges somewhat more equalized. Their efforts have met with little cooperation and no success. The hospital superiors have simply

told them that the terms for vacation are those stated in the hospital manual and that they saw no need to change them. Some of the individual nurses at Winthrop

then began to take matters into their own hands. The LPNs on the fourth floor of the hospital decided that if they couldn't have the extra vacation because of what was written in the manual then they would follow the manual in all phases and go strictly according to the book. Difficulties surfaced as soon as the LPNs began to behave in this manner. The RNs now seemed to have more work than they couid handle adequately and the LPNs were just as busy doing solely their "prescribecl" duties. The same amount cf effort put forth previously was being exerted, but less was being accomplished because of the need to jump around from place to place and job to job in order to work strict according to the book. An example of this wasted effort occurred in the taking of doctors' orders. Doctors phone in the type of treatment that a patient is to receive medicines, times for dispensing such, diet, and so forth. These doctors' orders are supposed to be taken by an RN, but in practice whoever was nearest the phone had taken the order. If an LPN took the order she had it signed by the supervisor (stationed at the desk) as a safeguard. This

procedure saved the time and effort involved in getting an RN to the phone for every order. Now, however, the LPNs refused to take the doctors' orders and called for an RN. The RN irad to leave the work she was doing, go to the phone, take

the order, then go back to her unfinished work. This procedure wasted the time of the doctor's , the RN, and the LPN who had to locate the RN. The LPNs' practice of going by the book brought about hostile feelings among both groups of nurses and among the doctors who had to work on the floor. The conflicts led to a lessening in the high degree of care that the patients had been receiving.

     The conflict initiated by the difference in vacation privileges brought about more complaints from both parties. In the manual the categories for vacation privileges listed : "supervisors", "RNs", "lab technicians", and "others". The LPNs resented being placed in the " others" category. They felt that they deserved a separate listing, especially because they had the same amount of training as other groups, such as the lab technicians. Adding further fuel to the fire was the fact that the lab technicians got a second week of vacation after only one year on the job. Another item of controversy was the fact that RNs were allowed to sign themselves in on the job when they reported, whereas the LPNs were required to punch in. The LPNs felt that the RNs thus could hide any incidents of lateness, whereas the LPNs had strict account kept of their time and were docked in salary for any time missed. The RNs. now complained to the hospital superiors more vehemently than ever about being understaffed. They felt that they simply needed more RNs on every floor on every shift to meet what was required of them; this was a demand they had been voicing even before the conflict began. The shortage was especially acute at nights, when unfamiliarity with individual patients often led to mix-ups in the treatments.

     The ill feelings led to arguments among the nurses. The LPNs felt that they were always doing more work than the RNs, that they spent more time with the patients because the RNs had more to do at the desk, and that they knew more about treatments because they more often accompanied doctors on their rounds. They now

voiced these opinions. The RNs argued superiority on the basis of a longer period of formal training.

 All these factors combined to bring about a tremendous drop in morale and a marked decrease in efficiency, and the conflict was in danger of spreading to the other floors in the hospital.

Questions :

(a) What are the issues involved in this case ?

(b) Why is there such conflict between these groups?

(c) What are the consequences of this conflict ?

(d) What might be done to alleviate the problem?

Page 3 of 4
You are here: Home Ms-26 Question bank